What’s in that pipe?

It turns out pipeline operators aren’t required to tell anyone:

After the dilbit gushed into the river, it began separating into its constituent parts. The heavy bitumen sank to the river bottom, leaving a mess that is still being cleaned up. Meanwhile, the chemical additives evaporated, creating a foul smell that lingered for days. People reported headaches, dizziness and nausea. No one could say with certainty what they should do. Federal officials at the scene didn’t know until weeks later that the pipeline was carrying dilbit, because federal law doesn’t require pipeline operators to reveal that information

David Appell point out the absurdity of the situation:

You can’t get on an airplane with a bottle of water, but you can run pipelines all over creation without telling anyone what’s in them.

And corporations complain about over-regulation.

2 Responses to What’s in that pipe?

  1. Doug Bostrom says:

    Crack, apparently.

    Sorry, read the headline, saw the facts, concluded that our regulators are intoxicated, so to speak.

  • Comment policy:
    Constructive comments that move the discussion on are always welcome, no matter what line of argumentation they take. Comments that add nothing interesting or which try to derail the ongoing discussion are ruthlessly purged. In doing this, we are not worrying about fairness, balance, etc. All we care about is constructive engagement. Comments from nonmembers must be explicitly approved, while comments from members may on occasion be demoted. Comments which are rejected or demoted, or where part of the article is edited, will be visible in full here
  • Registered users can login to bypass comment moderation

Leave a Reply